The article is an extremely sophisticated brand of namecalling.
The question is proposed: why do so many of the advocates of the Reform of the Reform advocate the same exact things?
What is curious about the various critiques, however, is the point at which many of them converge — that is in the specific style of liturgical aesthetics — despite the wide-range of approaches used to critique the reform. The style upheld is one of grandeur and ornate details, often inspired by gothic architecture from the high Medieval Ages to early Renaissance, along with the period’s elaborate rituals, processions, unutterable words and polyphony. The flaunting of the cappa magna, a surge of interest in Gregorian chant and renaissance polyphony, and the return of elaborate gothic chasubles are just three visible trends among many that reflect a growing adherence to such ideas of liturgical reform.The reason is obviously because we are all afraid of postmodernity.
Within a postmodern context, the liturgy is constantly in flux as communities repeatedly discern the “right” way of doing liturgy while fearing the slip into relativism: postmodernism is likely a key cultural catalyst behind the many post-Vatican II “experiments” that have understandably been criticized heavily. Performatism reacts to the uncertainty of postmodernism and attempts to ascertain objectivity in liturgy by appealing to arbitrary" authoritarian sources such as tradition."Performatism," according to the article, is a way we ROTR's and others who fear postmodernity get to feel secure again. There is some complicated mumbo jumbo that is hard to follow without reading a lot of modern philosophy first, but what it comes down to is that we're all really immersed in our times, feel uncomfortable with some aspects of them, and so we try to make a comfortable space for ourselves. And this process (since after all the article is on Pray Tell) ends up thusly:
The result is a false and shallow objectivity that manifests itself through partisan support for particular interpretations of liturgical aesthetics and obsessions over the letter rather than spirit of the law.Now it was pretty obvious that an article (on Pray Tell) that talked about "flaunting of the cappa magna" in its second paragraph was going to reach the by-now-cliched liturgical namecalling of the above. We ROTR's are false and shallow, in cahoots with authoritarianism, and we prefer the letter of the law to the spirit of the law.
In its final section, the article makes Hans Urs von Balthasar into some sort of hippie.
The author is obviously so very smart, that I wish she would write about things that are true. As an ROTRr myself, I understand quite well that my motivations have nothing to do with how obscure modern philosophers and liturgy grad students might think I react to postmodernity. The point of the Reform of the Reform is simple: human dignity. Why seek real beauty in the liturgy? Beauty expresses God. But also, beauty expresses us. We have been judged by God so important that we are worth His very self. We have been saved and we are becoming glorious. The glory of God is humanity fully alive. And that is worth getting dressed up for on Sunday morning.
All glorious is the princess within her chamber;
her gown is interwoven with gold.
In embroidered garments she is led to the king;
her virgin companions follow her—
those brought to be with her.
Led in with joy and gladness,
they enter the palace of the king.